Congratulations on Your Pregnancy

So here’s a blast from the past. I was going through some cards that I sent earlier this year, and I came across the card I sent to Cindy congratulating her on her pregnancy. Pay particular attention to the note I included. She had given me her HCG levels and I remember thinking that they were high, hence the observation about twins. Who called it?!

Of course, I could have never called what happened after she gave birth. Marvin McMurrey is still petitioning the court for ¬†“a Declaratory Judgement, establishing Petitioner, Marvin McMurrey III, as the children’s legal father and declaring that no parent-child relationships or standing to pursue any rights to the children exist between Respondent, Cindy Close, and the children…” (Emphasis and bold added.)

The next court date is November 5, 2012 at 1:30, with a march just before. I hope you’ll be there to show support for Cindy.
–Danielle

Want To Understand What’s Happening? Read This Article.

Pete Shanks of Biopolitical Times, published a blog post entitled, “Is This Informal Surrogacy or Exploitation?”

The article does an excellent job of summarizing all the pertinent facts of Cindy’s case. Definitely recommended reading if you want to come up to speed on what this case is all about.

“A bizarre tragedy is playing out in Houston. Some commentators are calling it “a landmark case in motherhood” but it seems more like either a horrible misunderstanding or an appalling case of exploitation.”

Visit http://bit.ly/OgomBT to read the entire article.

Supporter Posts Powerful Video

Cindy Close supporter Toni King of Mother’s Moments has created a powerful, “tissue required” video and was kind enough to share it with us. Please feel free to share it with as many people as you like.

Change.org Petition Posted

Our very own CindysTwins.com editor Kim Archer launched a Change.org petition on Sunday. It went “live” on Monday¬†with 100 signatures. Today we’re at 253 signatures and growing.

If you haven’t already done so, please take a moment to sign out petition and to share with as many people as you’re able.

Because the court may declare that Cindy is NOT the mother of her children based solely on the fact that she used donor eggs, even though she carried them and gave birth to them.

Moreover, a ruling against Cindy would set a precedent that would add another limitation on womens reproductive rights by making it unclear as to who is the actual mother. This would have the effect of making infertile women reluctant to use what is, for many, the last good chance they have of finally becoming a mother. It would also have the effect of making prospective egg donors reluctant to donate, whether for the chance of possibly being declared the legal mother or for having the children conceived from their eggs ending up without a mother.